High-melting polyolefin copolymer elastomers, catalysts and methods of synthesis

ABSTRACT

This invention relates to high melting polyolefin copolymers suitable as thermoplastic elastomers and catalysts and methods for their synthesis. These elastomeric olefin copolymers are characterized by a mole fraction of crystallizable component X c  from about 30 to about 99%; low glass transition temperatures, below −20° C., and typically below −50° C.; melting points above about 90° C.; high molecular weights; a molecular weight distribution M W /M n &lt;/=10; and a narrow composition distribution between chains of &lt;/=15%. The novel copolymers of the invention range from reactor blends to multiblock copolymers that can be sequentially fractionated into fractions of differing crystallinities, which fractions nevertheless show compositions of comonomers which differ by less than 15% from the parent polymer (reactor product). The invention also relates to a process for producing such copolymers by utilizing an unbridged, substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl metallocene catalyst that is capable of interconverting between states with different copolymerization characteristics, which interconversion is controlled by selecting the substituents of the cyclopentadienyl ligands so that the rate of interconversion of the two states is within several orders of magnitude of the rate of formation of a single polymer chain. Where r i &gt;r f  the polymer can be characterized as multiblock; where r i &lt;r f , the result is a polymer blend and where r i / r f  is close to 1, the resulting polymer is a mixture of blend and multiblock. The metallocene catalysts of the invention are able to interconvert between more than two states, with embodiments of four states being shown in FIG.  2.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS:

This application, and identical application Ser. No. 09/752,373 filed bythe same inventors of even date herewith, are each aContinuation-In-Part Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/227,228filed Jan. 8, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,151 Issued Jan. 2, 2001,which in turn is the regular application of an earlier filed Provisionalapplication Serial Number 60/071,050, entitled Catalyst and Process forSynthesis of Olefin Block Copolymers, filed Jan. 9, 1998 by Waymouth andKravchenko, which applications are hereby incorporated by referenceherein, and the benefit of the filing dates of which are hereby claimedunder 35U.S. Code §§112, 119 (e) and 120, and under appropriateprovisions of the PCT rules.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to high melting polyolefin copolymers suitable asthermoplastic elastomers and catalysts and methods for their synthesis.These olefin copolymers are characterized by low glass transitiontemperatures, melting points above about 90° C., high molecular weights,and a narrow composition distribution between chains. The copolymers ofthe invention are novel reactor blends that can be sequentiallyfractionated into fractions of differing crystallinities, said fractionsnevertheless show compositions of comonomers which differ by less than15% from the parent reactor blend. The invention also relates to aprocess for producing such copolymers by utilizing an unbridgedmetallocene catalyst that is capable of interconverting between stateswith different copolymerization characteristics.

BACKGROUND

Ethylene alpha-olefin copolymers are important commercial products.These copolymers find a particularly broad range of application aselastomers. There are generally three family of elastomers made fromsuch copolymers. One class is typified by ethylene-propylene copolymers(EPR) which are saturated compounds, optimally of low crystallinity,requiring vulcanization with free-radical generators to achieveexcellent elastic properties. Another type of elastomer is typified byethylene-propylene terpolymers (EPDM), again optimally of lowcrystallinity, which contain a small amount of a non-conjugated dienesuch as ethylidene norbomene. The residual unsaturation provided by thediene termonomomer allows for vulcanization with sulfur, which thenyields excellent elastomeric properties. Yet another class is typifiedby ethylene-alpha olefin copolymers of narrow composition distributionwhich possess excellent elastomeric properties even in the absence ofvulcanization. For example U.S. Pat. No. 5,278,272, to Dow describes aclass of substantially linear polyolefin copolymer elastomers withnarrow composition distribution and excellent processingcharacteristics. (These latter class of elastomers are typified forexample by the EXACT™ and ENGAGE™ brand products sold commercially byExxon and Dow, respectively.) One of the limitations of the latter classof elastomers is the low melting temperature of these materials whichlimits their high temperature performance.

Hence it would be extremely advantageous to industry to producecopolymers of ethylene and alpha olefins which would show bothelastomeric properties in the unvulcanized state and high meltingpoints.

THE INVENTION SUMMARY, OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES

It is among the objects of this invention to provide methods ofproduction of a class of novel polyolefin copolymers with a combinationof interesting and useful physical characteristics, including amolecular weight distribution, M_(w)/M_(n)</=10, a narrow compositiondistribution, </=15%, high melting point index, melting points greaterthan about 90° C. and elastomeric properties. It is a further object ofthis invention to produce a novel family of crystallizable, high-meltingpolyolefin copolymers having a narrow composition distribution where themelting point of the polymer is greater than about 90° C. It is afurther object of this invention to produce a class of high-melting,multiblock, blend, and multiblock/blend polyolefin copolymer elastomers.These novel polymers are useful as elastomeric and/or thermoplasticmaterials as well as compatibilizers for other polyolefin blends.

We have unexpectedly found that it is possible to prepare high meltingpolyolefin elastomers of narrow composition distribution using novelunbridged metallocenes as olefin polymerization catalysts. Forconvenience, certain terms used throughout the specification are definedbelow (with “</=” or “>/=” meaning less than or equal to, or greaterthan or equal to):

a. “Multiblock” polymer or copolymer means a polymer comprised ofmultiple block sequences of monomer units where the structure orcomposition of a given sequence differs from that of its neighbor.Furthermore a multiblock copolymer as defined herein will contain agiven sequence at least twice in every polymer chain.

b. The term “composition distribution” refers to the variation incomonomer composition between different polymer chains and can bedescribed as a difference, in mole percent, of a given weight percent ofa sample from the mean mole percent composition. The distribution neednot be symmetrical around the mean; when expressed as a number, forexample 15%, this shall mean the larger of the distributions from themean.

c. As used herein, the term “elastomeric” refers to a material whichtends to regain its shape upon extension, such as one which exhibits apositive power of recovery at 100, 200 and 300% elongation.

d. The term “melting point index”, also referred-to as MPI=T_(m)/X_(c),means the ratio of the melting point of the copolymer, Tm, to the molefraction of the crystallizable component, X_(c). By crystallizablecomponent, we mean a monomer component whose homopolymer is acrystalline polymer. The melting point is taken as a maximum in amelting endotherm, as determined by differential scanning calorimetry.

The copolymers of the present invention have the followingcharacteristics:

(a) a mole fraction of crystallizable component X_(c) from 30-99%;

(b) a molecular weight distribution M_(w)/M_(n)</=10; and

(c) melting points above about 90° C.;

which copolymers comprise from 0-70% by weight of an ether solublefraction, and from 0-95% of a hexanes soluble fraction which can exhibita melting range up to about 125° C., and from 0-95% of a hexanesinsoluble fraction which can exhibit a melting range up to about 142° C.

The copolymers of the present invention in one embodiment can becharacterized as reactor blends in that they can be fractionated intofractions of differing degrees of crystallinity and differing meltingpoints. Nevertheless, the comonomer composition of the various fractionsof the copolymers are within 15% of the composition of the resultantpolymer product produced in the reactor.

The melting points of the copolymers of the present invention are high,typically above 90° C. and the melting point indices, T_(m)/X_(c) arealso high, typically above 80° C. and preferably above 115° C. Thefractions can also exhibit high melting point indices. For example, itis possible to isolate a hexanes soluble fraction from the copolymers ofthe present invention that exhibits a melting point as high as 115° C.and a melting point index as high as 160° C. The glass transitiontemperatures of the copolymers are low, typically less than −20° C. andpreferably below −50° C.

The molecular weights of the polymers of the present invention can bequite high, with weight average molecular weights in excess ofM_(w)=1,000,000 readily obtained and molecular weights as high as2,000,000 observed. The molecular weight distributions of the copolymersare typically M_(w)/M_(n)</=10, preferably M_(w)/M_(n)</=8 and mostpreferably </=6.

In one embodiment, the copolymers of the present invention exhibituseful elastomeric properties. They can be used in a variety ofapplications typical of amorphous or partially crystalline elastomersand as compatibilizers for copolymer blends.

While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that in theprocess of the invention, different active species of the catalyst arein equilibrium during the construction of the copolymer chains. This isprovided for in the present invention by a class of unbridgedmetallocenes that are capable of isomerizing between states that havedifferent copolymerization characteristics during the polymerizationprocess. This process can thus lead to multiblock copolymers orcopolymer blends where the blocks or components of the blends havedifferent compositions of comonomers.

One embodiment of the invention includes metallocene catalysts which areable to interconvert between states whose coordination geometries aredifferent. Thus, the invention includes selecting the substituents ofthe metallocene cyclopentadienyl ligands so that the rate ofinterconversion of the two states is within several orders of magnitudeof the rate of formation of a single polymer chain. That is, if the rateof interconversion between states of the catalyst, r_(i), is greaterthan the rate of formation of an individual polymer chain, r_(f), onaverage, the polymer resulting from use of the inventive process andcatalysts can be characterized as multiblock (as defined above). If therate of interconversion is less than the rate of formation, the resultis a polymer blend. Where the rates are substantially balanced, thepolymer can be characterized as a mixture of blend and multiblock. Theremay be a wide range of variations and intermediate cases amongst thesethree exemplars.

The nature of the substituents on the cyclopentadienyl ligands iscritical; the substitution pattern of the cyclopentadienyl ligandsshould be such that the coordination geometries are different in orderto provide for different reactivities toward ethylene and other alphaolefins while in the two states (see FIG. 1) and that the rate ofinterconversion of the states of the catalyst are within several ordersof magnitude of the rate of formation of a single chain.

A further embodiment includes metallocene catalysts which are able tointerconvert between more than two states whose coordination geometriesare different. This is provided for by metallocenes withcyclopentadienyl-type ligands substituted in such a way that more thantwo stable states of the catalyst have coordination geometries that aredifferent, for example, a catalyst with four geometries is illustratedin one embodiment in FIG. 2.

According to the process of this invention, the properties of thecopolymers can be controlled by changing the nature of thecyclopentadienyl units on the catalysts, by changing the nature of themetal atom in the catalyst, by changing the nature of the comonomers andthe comonomer feed ratio, and by changing the temperature.

The molecular weights of the polymers produced with the catalysts of theinvention are very high. The molecular weight of the polymer product canbe controlled, optionally, by controlling the temperature or by addingany number of chain transfer agents such as hydrogen or metal alkyls, asis well known in the art.

The catalyst system of the present invention consists of the transitionmetal component metallocene in the presence of an appropriatecocatalyst. In broad aspect, the transition metal compounds have theformula:

in which M is a Group 3, 4 or 5 Transition metal, a Lanthanide or anActinide, X and X′ are the same or different uninegative ligands, suchas but not limited to hydride, halogen, hydrocarbyl, halohydrocarbyl,amine, amide, or borohydride substituents (preferably halogen, alkoxide,or C₁ to C₇ hydrocarbyl), and L and L′ are the same or differentpolynuclear hydrocarbyl, silahydrocarbyl, phosphahydrocarbyl,azahydrocarbyl, arseni-hydrocarbyl or borahydrocarbyl rings, typically asubstituted cyclo-pentadienyl ring or heterocyclopentadienyl ring, incombination with an appropriate cocatalyst. Exemplary preferredTransition Metals include Titanium, Hafnium, Vanadium, and, mostpreferably, Zirconium. An exemplary Group 3 metal is Yttrium, aLanthanide is Samarium, and an Actinide is Thorium.

Preferably L and L′ have the formula:

where R₁, R₂, R₃, R₉, and R₁₀ may be the same or different hydrogen,alkyl, alkylsilyl, aryl, benzyl, alkoxyalkyl, alkoxyaryl, alkoxysilyl,aminoalkyl, aminoaryl, branched alkyl, or substituted alkyl, alkylsilylor aryl substituents of 1 to about 30 carbon atoms.

Ligands of this general structure include substituted cyclopentadienes.Other ligands L and L′ of Formula 2 for the production ofpropylene-ethylene copolymers include substituted cyclopentadienes ofthe general formula:

where R₂-R₁₀ have the same definition as R₁, R₂, R₃, R₉, and R₁₀ above.Preferred cyclopentadienes of Formula 3 include3,4-dimethyl-1-phenyl-1,3-cyclopentadiene (R₂═R₃═CH₃, R₆═H);3,4-dimethyl-1-p-tolyl-1,3-cyclopentadiene (R₂═R₃═CH₃, R₆═CH₃);3,4,-dimethyl-1-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,3-cyclopentadiene(R₂═R₃═CH₃, R₆═CF₃); and3,4-dimethyl-1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,3-cyclo-pentadiene (R₂═R₃═CH₃,R₆═tBu).

Alternately preferred L and L′ of Formula 1 include ligands of Formula 2wherein R₁ is an aryl group, such as a substituted phenyl, biphenyl, ornaphthyl group, and R₂ and R₃ are connected as part of a ring of threeor more carbon atoms. Especially preferred for L or L′ of Formulas 1-3for producing the copolymers of this invention are substituted indenylligands, more particularly 2-arylindene of formula:

where R₄-R₁₄ may be the same or different hydrogen, halogen, aryl,benzyl, hydrocarbyl, silahydrocarbyl, or halohydrocarbyl substituents.That is, R₁ of Formula 2 is R₄-R₈-substituted benzene, and R₂, R₃ arecyclized in a 6-carbon ring to form the indene moiety.

Particularly preferred 2-aryl indenes include at present as preferredbest mode compounds: 2-phenylindene (Ligand C); 1-methyl-2-phenyl indene(Ligand D); 2-(3,5-dimethylphenyl) indene;2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl) indene (Ligand A);1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl) indene (Ligand B);2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl) indene; 1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indene; 2-(3,5-bis-trimethyl-silylphenyl)indene;1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trimethylsilylphenyl)indene; 2-(4-fluorophenyl)indene; 2-(2, 3, 4, 5-tetrafluoro phenyl) indene; 2-(2, 3, 4, 5,6-pentafluorophenyl) indene; 2-(1-naphthyl) indene; 2-(2-naphthyl)indene; 2-[(4-phenyl)phenyl] indene; 2-[(3-phenyl) phenyl] indene;1-benzyl-2-phenylindene; and 1-benzyl-2(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indene(Ligand E).

Preferred metallocenes according to the present invention include bothbis ligand (two identical ligands) and mixed ligands (the ligands arenot identical) metallocenes having any combination of the above arylindenes (and their sterically functionally hindering equivalents), suchas but not limited to:

bis(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride;

bis(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dimethyl;

bis(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride;

bis(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dimethyl;

bis[2-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

bis[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

bis[2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

bis[2-(3,5-bis-trimethylsilylphenyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

bis[2-(4,-fluorophenyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

bis[2-(2,3,4,5,-tetraflorophenyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

bis(2-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorophenyl)indenyl]) zirconium dichloride;

bis[2-(1-naphthyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

bis(2-(2-naphthyl)indenyl]) zirconium dichloride;

bis(2-[(4-phenyl)phenyl]indenyl]) zirconium dichloride;

bis[2-[(3-phenyl)phenyl]indenyl] zirconium dichloride;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconiumdichloride;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconiumdimethyl;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dimethyl;

(cyclopentadienyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride;

(cyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride;

(cyclopentadienyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dimethyl;

(cyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dimethyl;

(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl)(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride (i.e.,Ligands D and C, Metallocene 6, Table 3);

(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl)[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl]zirconium dichloride (i.e., Ligands D and A, Metallocene 8, Table 3);

[1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl](2-phenylindenyl)zirconium dichloride (i.e., Ligands B and C, Metallocene 7, Table 3);

[1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl][2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethyphenyl)indenyl]zirconium dichloride (i.e., Ligands B and A, Metallocene 9, Table 3);

(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl)[2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl] zirconiumdichloride;

(2-phenylindenyl)(1-benzyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride;

(2-phenylindenyl)[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl] zirconiumdichloride (i.e., Ligands C and A);

[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl][ 1-benzyl-2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl] zirconium dichloride (i.e.,Ligands A and E);

(2-phenylindenyl)][1-benzyl-2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl]zirconium dichloride (i.e., Ligands C and E, Metallocene 11);

and the corresponding hafnium compounds such as:

bis(2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dichloride;

bis(2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dimethyl;

bis(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dichloride;

bis(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dimethyl;

bis[2-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethyphenyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis[2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis[2-(3,5-bis-trimethylsilylphenyl) indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis[2,(4-fluorophenyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis[2-(2,3,4,5-tetrafluorophenyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis [2-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorophenyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis[2-(1-naphthyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis[2-(2-naphthyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

bis(2-((4-phenyl)phenyl)indenyl]) hafnium dichloride;

bis[2-[(3-phenyl)phenyl]indenyl] hafnium dichloride;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) hafniumdichloride;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dichloride;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(3-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) hafniumdimethyl;

(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dimethyl;

(cyclopentadienyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dichloride;

(cyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dichloride;

(cyclopentadienyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dimethyl;

(cyclopentadienyl)(2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dimethyl;

(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl)(2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dichloride (LigandsD and C);

(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl)[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl]hafnium dichloride (Ligands D and A);

[1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl](2-phenylindenyl)hafnium dichloride (Ligands B and C);

[1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl][2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenylindenyl]hafnium dichloride (Ligands B and A);

(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl)[2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl] hafniumdichloride;

(2-phenylindenyl)(1-benzyl-2-phenylindenyl) hafnium dichloride;

(2-phenylindenyl)[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl] hafniumdichloride (i.e., Ligands C and A);

[2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl][1-benzyl-2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl] hafnium dichloride (i.e.,Ligands A and E);

(2-phenylindenyl)][1-benzyl-2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indenyl] hafniumdichloride (i.e., Ligands C and E); and the like.

Other metallocene catalyst components of the catalyst system accordingto the present invention include:

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclopentadienyl) zirconium dichloride;

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-p-tolylcyclopentadienyl) zirconium dichloride;

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-(3,5bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride;

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)cyclopentadienyl) zirconiumdichloride;

(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenyl-1,3-cyclopentadiene)(3,4-dimethyl-1-p-tolylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride;

(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclopentadienyl)(3,4-dimethyl-1-(3,5bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)cyclopentadienyl) zirconium dichloride;

(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclopentadienyl)(3,4-dimethyl-1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)cyclopentadienyl) zirconium dichloride;

and the corresponding hafnium compounds, such as:

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclopentadienyl) hafnium dichloride;

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-p-tolylcyclopentadienyl) hafnium dichloride;

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-(3,5bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)cyclopentadienyl)hafnium dichloride;

bis(3,4-dimethyl-1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)cyclopentadienyl) hafniumdichloride;

(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclopentadienyl)(3,4-dimethyl-1-p-tolylcyclopentadienyl)hafnium dichloride;

(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclopentadienyl)(3,4-dimethyl-1-(3,5bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)cyclopentadienyl) hafnium dichloride;

(3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclopentadienyl)(3,4-dimethyl-1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)cyclopentadienyl) hafnium dichloride; and the like.

It should be understood that other unbridged, rotating, non-rigid,fluxional metallocenes may be employed in the methods of this invention,including those disclosed in our above-identified Provisionalapplication, which is hereby incorporated by reference to extent neededfor support.

The Examples disclose a method for preparing the metallocenes in highyield. Generally, the preparation of the metallocenes consists offorming the indenyl ligand followed by metallation with the metaltetrahalide to form the complex.

Appropriate cocatalysts include alkylaluminum compounds,methylaluminoxane, or modified methylaluminoxanes of the type describedin the following references: U.S. Pat. No. 4,542,199 to Kaminsky, etal,; Ewen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106 (1984), p. 6355; Ewen, et al., J. Am.Chem. Soc. 109 (1987) p. 6544; Ewen, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110(1988), p. 6255; Kaminsky, et al, Angew. Chem., hit. Ed. Eng. 24 (1985),p. 507. Other cocatalysts which may be used include Lewis or proticacids, such as B(C₆F₅)₃ or (PhNMe₂H)⁺B(C₆F₅)₄ ⁻, which generate cationicmetallocenes with compatible non-coordinating anions in the presence orabsence of alkyl-aluminum compounds. Catalyst systems employing acationic Group 4 metallocene and compatible non-coordinating anions aredescribed in European Patent Applications 277,003 and 277,004 filed onJan. 27, 1988 by Turner, et al.; European Patent Application 427,697-A2filed on Oct. 9, 1990 by Ewen, et al.; Marks, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,113 (1991), p. 3623; Chien, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991), p.8570; Bochmann et al., Angew. Chem. Intl., Ed. Engl. 7 (1990), p. 780;and Teuben et al., Organometallics, 11 (1992), p. 362, and referencestherein.

The catalysts of the present invention comprise un-bridged, non-rigid,fluxional metallocenes which can change their geometry with a rate thatis within several orders of magnitude of the rate of formation of asingle polymer chain, on average. In accordance with the invention, therelative rates of interconversion and of formation can be controlled byselecting the substituents (or absence thereof) of the cyclopentadienylligands so that they can alternate in structure between states ofdifferent coordination geometries which have different selectivitytoward a particular comonomer.

In one of many embodiments, these catalyst systems can be placed on asuitable support such as silica, alumina, or other metal oxides, MgCl₂or other supports. These catalysts can be used in the solution phase, inslurry phase, in the gas phase, or in bulk monomer. Both batch andcontinuous polymerizations can be carried out. Appropriate solvents forsolution polymerization include liquified monomer, and aliphatic oraromatic solvents such as toluene, benzene, hexane, heptane, diethylether, as well as halogenated aliphatic or aromatic solvents such asCH₂Cl₂, chlorobenzene, fluorobenzene, hexaflourobenzene or othersuitable solvents. Various agents can be added to control the molecularweight, including hydrogen, silanes and metal alkyls such asdiethylzinc.

The metallocenes of the present invention, in the presence ofappropriate cocatalysts, are useful for the homo-polymerization andco-polymerization of alpha-olefins, such as propylene, 1-butene,1-pentene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, and combinationsthereof, and of copolymerization with ethylene. The polymerization ofolefins is carried out by contacting the olefin(s) with the catalystsystems comprising the transition metal component and in the presence ofan appropriate cocatalyst, such as an aluminoxane, a Lewis acid such asB(C₆F₅)₃, or a protic acid in the presence of a non-coordinatingcounterion such as B(C₆F₅)₄ ⁻.

The metallocene catalyst systems of the present invention areparticularly useful for the polymerization of ethylene and alpha-olefincomonomers as well as alpha-olefin monomer mixtures to produceco-polymers with novel elastomeric properties. The properties ofelastomers are characterized by several variables. The tensile set (TS)is the elongation remaining in a polymer sample after it is stretched toan arbitary elongation (e.g. 100% or 300%) and allowed to recover. Lowerset indicates higher elongational recovery. Stress relaxation ismeasured as the decrease in stress (or force) during a time period (e.g.30 sec. or 5 min.) that the specimen is held at extension. There arevarious methods for reporting hysteresis during repeated extensions. Inthe present application, retained force is measured as the ratio ofstress at 50% elongation during the second cycle recovery to the initialstress at 100% elongation during the same cycle. Higher values ofretained force and lower values of stress relaxation indicate strongerrecovery force. Better general elastomeric recovery properties areindicated by low set, high retained force and low stress relaxation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is described, inter alia, with reference to the drawings,in which:

FIG. 1 is a stereoisomeric representation of unbridged metallocenes ofthis invention having different substituents in the positions R₁ throughR₁₀ with the arrows showing the interconversion between states A and Bin which the reactivity toward ethylene, r_(E), and other alpha olefinsdiffers in the two states;

FIG. 2 shows four possible coordination geometries for unbridgedmetallocenes of this invention, with the circles representingcoordination sites for olefin insertion;

FIG. 3 is a graph of DSC traces of ethylene/propylene copolymers,containing 40-60% ethylene in accordance with Examples 110 through 114;and

FIG. 4 is a graph of DSC traces of ethylene/1-hexene copolymers,containing 49-85% ethylene in accordance with Examples 116 through 124.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION INCLUDING THE BEST MODE OF CARRYING OUT THEINVENTION

The following detailed description illustrates the invention by way ofexample, not by way of limitation of the principles of the invention.This description will clearly enable one skilled in the art to make anduse the invention, and describes several embodiments, adaptations,variations, alternatives and uses of the invention, including what arepresently believed to be the best modes of carrying out the inventions.

In this regard, the invention is illustrated in the several examples,and is of sufficient complexity that the many aspects,interrelationships, and sub-combinations thereof simply cannot be fullyillustrated in a single example. For clarity and conciseness, several ofthe examples show, or report only aspects of a particular feature orprinciple of the invention, while omitting those that are not essentialto or illustrative of that aspect. Thus, the best mode embodiment of oneaspect or feature may be shown in one example or test, and the best modeof a different aspect will be called out in one or more other examples,tests, structures, formulas, or discussions.

The metallocene catalysts of the present invention are represented inone embodiment in FIG. 1 where the ligands L and L′ are substitutedcyclopentadienyl rings. As shown in the Figure, in state Acyclopentadienyl substituents R₁, R₂ and R₆ and R₇ project over theligands X=X′ whereas in state B, cyclopentadienyl substituents R₁, R₂and R₈ and R₉ project over the ligands X=X′. As provided for in theprocess of this invention, catalysts derived from these metalloceneswhere substituents R₆ and R₇ are different from R₈ and R₉ will exhibitreactivity ratios for ethylene in state A (r_(EA)) different from thatin state B (r_(EB)).

Another embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 2 where theligands L and L′ are different substituted 2-arylindenyl ligands suchthat the metallocene interconverts between four states with differentcoordination geometries. As shown in the Figure, in two states a methylgroup projects over the coordination sites for olefin insertion(represented in this figure by circles) and in two states the methylgroup projects away from the coordination sites for the olefin. Thefollowing examples illustrate the control of the polymer properties viaselection of the ligand substitution groups.

EXAMPLES.

All organometallic reactions were conducted using standard Schlenk anddrybox techniques. Elemental analyses were conducted by E+RMicroanalytical Laboratory. Unless otherwise specified all reagents werepurchased from commercial suppliers and used without furtherpurification. 2-Phenylindene, 1-methyl-2-phenylindene,2-(bis(3′,5′-trifluoromethyl) phenylindene,bis(2-phenylindenyl)zirconium dichloride, rac- andmeso-bis(l-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride,ethylene-bis(indenyl)zirconium dichloride and bis(2-(bis(3′,5′-trifluoromethyl)phenylindenyl)-zirconium dichloride were preparedaccording to the literature procedures.(Kravchenko, R.; Waymouth, R. M.Macromolecules 1998, 31, 1-6.) Hexane, pentane and methylene chlorideused in organometallic synthesis were distilled from calcium hydrideunder nitrogen. Tetrahydrofuran was distilled from sodium/benzophenoneunder nitrogen. Toluene, ethylene and propylene were passed through twopurification columns packed with activated alumina and supported coppercatalyst. 1-Hexene and chloroform-d₃ were distilled from calcium hydrideand benzene-d₆ was distilled from sodium/benzophenone.

I. Metallocene Synthesis

Ethylene-bis(indenyl)zirconium dichloride (Metallocene 1). This complexwas prepared as described in Wild, F. R. W. P.; Wasiucionek, M.; Hutter,G.; Brintzinger, H. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 288, 63-7.

Bis(2-phenylindenyl)zirconium dichloride (Metallocene 2). This complexwas prepared as described in Bruce, M. D.; Coates, G. W.; Hauptman, E.;Waymouth, R. M.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11174-11182.

Bis(2-phenylindenyl)hafnium dichloride (Metallocene 3). This complex wasprepared as described in Bruce, M. D.; Coates, G. W.; Hauptman, E.;Waymouth, R. M.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11174-11182.

Example 1.

Preparation of 2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene (Ligand A)

A 3-neck 500 mL round-bottomed flask fitted with a condenser and anaddition funnel was charged with 2.62 g (0.11 mol) of Mg turnings and 20mL of anhydrous diethyl ether. Slow addition of a solution of 25.10 g(0.09 mol) of 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl) bromobenzene in diethyl ether(100 mL), followed by refluxing for 30 min, gave a brown-grey solutionof the aryl Grignard reagent. The solution was cooled to roomtemperature (RT), filtered over a plug of Celite and evacuated to yielda brown oil. Toluene (40 mL) was added and the suspension cooled to 0°C. whereupon a solution of 2-indanone (9.22 g, 0.07 mol) in toluene (60mL) was added dropwise to give a tan-brown slurry. This mixture waswarmed to room temperature and stirred for an additional 3 hours. Aftercooling to 0° C. it was quenched with 150 mL of water, hexane (200 mL)added and the reaction mixture neutralized with 5 M HCl. The organiclayer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with two 50-mLportions of hexane. The combined organic layers were washed with two50-mL portions of brine and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate.After filtration over Celite, the solvent was removed under vacuoyielding 21.5 g (89% based on 2-indanone) of2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl) indanol as an off-white solid. ¹H NMR(CDCl₃, 23 C, 400 MHz): d 8.05 (s, 2H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.5-7.0 (M, 4H),3.41 (m, 4H), 2.21 (s, 1H, OH). Under argon, this alcohol (21.5 g, 0.06mol) and p-toluene-sulfonic acid monohydrate (800 mg) were dissolved intoluene (250 mL) and the solution was heated to reflux for 6 hours toafford 14.4 g, (70%) of 2-(bis-3,5(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl) indene uponrecrystallization from diethyl ether/hexane at −18 C. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 23°C., 400 MHz): d 8.01 (s, 2H), Ar_(f)), 7.75 (s, 1H, Ar_(f)), 7.52 (d,J=7 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J=7 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (s, 1H), 7.33 (dd, 2J=7 Hz, 1H),7.27 (dd, 2J=7 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (s, 2H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 23 C, 100 MHz):L144.3 (s), 143.1 (s), 138.0 (s), 132.1 (q, ²J_(C—F)=33 Hz), 130.1 (d,J_(C—H)=167 Hz), 127.0 (dd), J_(C—H)=160 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=7 Hz), 126.0 (dd,J_(C—H)=159 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=7 Hz)m 125.2 (brd, J_(C—H)=162 Hz), 123.9 (dd,J_(C—H)=156 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=9 Hz), 123.4 (q, J_(C—F)=273 Hz, CF₃), 121.8(dd, J_(c-H)=160 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=8 Hz), 120.6 (brd, J_(C—H)=167 Hz), 38.9(td, J_(C—H)=127 Hz, J_(C—H)=7 Hz, CH₂). C,H analysis: Anal. Found(Calcd): C, 62.45 (62-20); H 3.01 (3.07).

Example 2.

Preparation of Bis(2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl) zirconiumdichloride, (Metallocene 4)

N-Butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 0.850 mL, 2.13 mmol) was added to asolution of 2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl) indene (648 mg, 1.97 mmol)in toluene (15 mL). The heterogeneous solution was stirred at ambienttemperature for 4 hours 30 minutes to give a green-yellow solution whichwas treated with a suspension of ZrCl₄ (240 mg, 1.03 mmol)in toluene (20mL) via cannula. The yellow suspension was stirred at room temperaturefor 2.5 hours, heated to ca. 80° C., and filtered over a plug of Celite.After washing the Celite with hot toluene several times (3×10 mL), thefiltrate was concentrated and cooled to 18 C. to give 442 mg (55%) oflight yellow crystals of Bis(2-(Bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)-indenyl)zirconium dichloride. ¹H NMR (C₆D₆, 23 C., 400 MHz): d 7.67 (s, 2H,Ar_(f)), 7.55 (s, 4H, Ar_(f)), 7.19 (m, 4H, Ar), 6.89 (m, 4H, Ar), 5.96(s, 4H, Cp-H). ¹³C NMR (C₆ _(D) ₆, 23 C., 100 MHz: d 135.6 (s), 133.1(s), 131.6 (q, ²J_(C—F)=33 Hz), 127.1 (brd, J_(C—H)=161 Hz), 126.8 (s),126.4 (dd, J_(C—H)=161 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=8 Hz), 125.4 (dd, J_(C—H)=167 Hz),²J_(C—H)=5 Hz), 123.8 (q, J_(C—F)=273 Hz, C—_(F.)), 121. 8 (brd,J_(C—H)=159 Hz), 102. 5 (dd, J_(C—H)=176 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=7 Hz, Cp (C—H).C,H analysis: Anal. found (Calcd.): C, 49.99 (50.01); H 2.32 (2.22).

Example 3.

Preparation of Bis(2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl) hafniumdichloride, (Metallocene 5)

N-Butyllithium (1.6 M in hexanes, 2 mL. 3.20 mmol) was added dropwise atroom temperature to a solution of2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene (1.03 g. 3.14 mmol) in diethylether (10 mL). After stirring for 30 min, the solvent was removed invacuo leaving a green-yellow solid. In a drybox, HfCl₄, (510 mg, 1.59mmol) was added to the lithium salt. The solids were then cooled to −78°C. at which temperature toluene (45 mL) was slowly added. The flask wasallowed to reach ambient temperature and the suspension was stirred for24 hours after which time it was heated for 15 min to ca. 80° C. (heatgun). The solvent was then removed in vacuo. The solid was extractedwith CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL) and the solution filtered over a plug of Celite.After washing the Celite with 4×15 mL CH₂Cl₂, the solvent was removed invacuo from the filtrate. The solid was dissolved in 15 mL of CH₂Cl₂,filtered and over filtrate a layer of hexane (40 mL) was slowly added.Crystals of Bis(2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl) indenyl) hafniumdichloride Catalyst E were obtained from this layered solution at −18 C.¹H NMR (C₆D₆, 23° C., 200 MHz); d 7.65 (s, 2H, Ar_(f)), 7.51 (s, 4H,Ar_(f)), 6.7-7.3 (m, 8H Ar), 5.63 (s, 4H, Cp-H). ¹³ C NMR (C₆D₆ 23° C.,100 MHz): d 135.8 (s), 132.9 (s), 131.6 (q, ²J_(C—F)=34 Hz), 127.2 (brd,J_(C—H)=160 Hz), 126.3 (dd, J_(C—H)=161 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=8 Hz), 126.0 (s),125.6 (dd, J_(C—H)=167 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=5 Hz), 123.8 (q, J_(C—F)=273 Hz,CF₃), 121.7 (brd, J_(C—H)=161 Hz), 100.1 (dd, J_(C—H)=176 Hz, ²J_(C—H)=6Hz, Cp C—H). C, H analysis: Anal. Found (Calcd.): C, 45.10 (45-18); H,1.87 (2.01).

Example 4.

1-Methyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene and3-methyl-2-(bis-3′, 5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene. (Ligand B)

A solution of 2-bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene (1.819 g, 5.54mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (30 mL) was cooled to −78° C. and BuLi (2.5 Min hexanes, 2.33 mL, 5.82 mmol) was added dropwise. The resultingorange-brown solution was allowed to warm to room temperature andstirred for an additional 30 min. Then CH₃I (1.20 mL, 19 mmol) was addedto this solution and the greenish reaction mixture was stirred for 20 hat room temperature. Methanol (20 mL) was added and the solvents removedin vacuo. The resulting brown solid was extracted with toluene (30 mL)and filtered through a glass frit packed with Celite. The brown solutionwas washed with H₂O (2×10 mL) and saturated NaCl solution (2×10 mL),dried over MgSO₄, and then evaporated to dryness. Crystallization fromhexanes gave yellow crystals of 5.7 (1.073 g). ¹H NMR (20° C., CDCl₃,400 MHz): 7.87 (s, 2H), 7.75 (s, 1H), 7.49 (d, 1H, J=7.3 Hz), 7.42 (d,1H, J=7.6 Hz), 7.37 (t, 1H, J=7.3 Hz), 7.26 (td, 1H, J=7.3 Hz, J=1.2Hz), 3.78 (s, 2H), 2.33 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd (Found) for C₁₈H₁₂F₆: C,63.16 (63.12); H 3.53 (3.62). Repeated crystallization from hexanes gavea mixture of isomers of the ligand (309 mg) in 4:1 ratio. ¹H NMR: 3.14(q, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 0.87 (d, 3 H, J=7.1 Hz). Overall yield 1.073 g, 73%.

Example 5.

Synthesis of (2-phenylindenyl) zirconium trichloride.

Solid Zr(NMe₂)₄ (1.280 g, 4.785 mmol) and 2-phenylindene (0.920 g, 4.785mmol) were combined with toluene (30 mL) in a 100-mL Schlenk tube andthe resulting pale yellow solution was stirred for 2.5 h at roomtemperature under slightly reduced pressure. Then the solution wasevaporated to dryness to give a yellow oil which was extracted withpentane (20 mL) and filtered through a cannula fitted with a doublelayer of filter paper. The resulting pentane solution was concentratedto a total volume of 10 mL and placed into a −50° C. freezer overnight.The resulting yellow solid was isolated, dried in vacuo, and redissolvedin CH₂Cl₂ (15 mL). The pale yellow solution was cooled to 0 C. andchlorotrimethylsilane (2 mL, 15.8 mmol) was added via syringe. Thebright yellow solution was allowed to warm to room temperature andstirred for 1 h. Then the solution was evaporated to dryness to yield ayellow/orange foamy solid. Toluene (30 mL) was added and the mixture wasstirred for 48 h to yield a lemon yellow powder, which was isolated anddried in vacuo (1.098 g, 59% yield). This material was used withoutfurther purification.

Example 6.

Synthesis of (2-phenylindenyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl) zirconiumdi-chloride, (Metallocene 6).

Butyllithium (2.5 M in hexane, 0.43 mL, 1.08 mmol) was added via syringeto the solution of 1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl (212 mg, 1.029 mmol) indiethyl ether (25 mL) at −78° C. The resulting light yellow solution wasallowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for additional 30 min.The ether was removed in vacuo to yield a white powdery solid, which wascombined with solid (2-phenylindenyl)zirconium trichloride (400 mg,1.029 mmol) and toluene (50 mL). The resulting suspension was stirredfor 24 h at room temperature. Gradually the solids dissolved to give ayellow turbid solution. The mixture was filtered through a glass fritpacked with Celite and then evaporated to dryness. The resulting yellowsolid was recrystallized from CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) layered with pentane (30mL) at −50° C. to give metallocene 6., 181 mg, 31% yield. ¹H NMR (20°C., C₆D₆, 400 MHz): d 7.41 (d, 2H, J=11.2 Hz), 7.30 (d, 2H, J=10.8 Hz),7.24-6.80 (m, 13H), 6.73 (d, 1H, J=11.2 Hz), 6.50 (d, 1H, J=3.2 Hz),6.26 (d, 1H, J=3.3 Hz), 5.98 (s, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H). ¹³C {¹H} NMR (20°C., CDCl₃, 125 MHz): d 133.75 (C), 133.10 (C), 132.38 (C), 131.41 (C),129.54 (C), 129.06 (C—H), 128.90 (C—H), 128.70 (C—H), 128.67 (C—H),128.14 (C—H), 126.95 (C), 126.72 (C—H), 126.58 (C—H), 126.56 (C—H),126.43 (C—H), 126.26 (C—H), 125.58 (C—H), 125.05 (C), 124.90 (CH),124.56 (C), 124.35 (C—H), 123.68 (C—H), 121.43 (C), 104.34 (C—H, Cp),100.70 (C—H, Cp), 99.00 (C—H, Cp), 12.54 (CH₃). Anal. Calcd (Found) forC₃₁H₂₄Cl₂Zr: C 66.65 (66.92); H 4.33 (4.36).

Example 7.

Synthesis of (2-phenylindenyl)(1-methyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoro-methylphenyl) indenyl) zirconium dichloride, Metallocene 7.

Butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 0.43 mL, 1.08 mmol) was added to thepale yellow solution of1-methyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene (352 mg, 1.029 mmol)in diethyl ether (20 mL) at −78° C. via syringe. The resulting yellowsolution was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred foradditional 30 min. Ether was removed in vacuo to yield a pale yellowsolid which was washed with pentane (20 mL) and combined with solid(2-phenylindenyl)zirconium trichloride (400 mg, 1.029 mmol) and toluene(50 mL). The resulting suspension was stirred for 24 h at roomtemperature. Gradually the solids dissolved to give a yellow turbidsolution. This solution was filtered through a glass frit packed withCelite and then evaporated to dryness. The yellow solid 7 wasrecrystallized from CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) layered with pentane (20 mL) at −50°C.: (245 mg, 34%). ¹H NMR (20° C., C₆D₆, 400 MHz): 7.67 (s, br, 1H),7.64 (s, br, 2H), 7.30-6.78 (m, 13H), 6.43 (d, 1H, J=2.4 Hz), 6.19 (d,1H, J=2.4 Hz), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.32 (s, ⅓ H, CH ₂Cl₂), 2.24 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (20° C., CDCl₃, 125 MHz): 135.91 (C—H), 133.59 (C), 132.58 (C),131.47 (C—CF₃, ²J_(C—F)=33 Hz), 130.76 (C), 130.51 (C), 129.02 (C—H),128.98 (C—H), 128.80 (C—H), 126.87 (C—H), 126.81 (C—H), 126.77 (C—H),126.62 (C—H), 126.52 (C—H), 126.25 (C—H), 126.21 (C), 125.34 (C—H),125.05 (C), 124.09 (C—H), 123.86 (C), 123.23 (CF₃, J_(C—F)=273 Hz),123.17 (C), 121.24 (C—H, br), 119.25 (C), 102.70 (C—H, Cp), 101.76 (C—H,Cp), 99.30 (C—H, Cp), 12.12 (CH₃). Anal. Calcd (Found) forC₃₃H₂₂Cl₂F₆Zr×⅙·CH₂Cl₂: C 55.86 (56.20); H 3.37 (3.18). After havingbeen stored for 3-4 weeks in the drybox in a clear vial the yellowcompound turned green in color. No changes in ¹H NMR spectrum weredetected upon the color change.

Example 8.

Synthesis of (2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl) zirconiumtrichloride.

Solid Zr(NMe₂)₄ (1.260 g, 4.713 mmol) and1-methyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene (1.505 g, 4.58 mmol)were combined with toluene (30 mL) in a 100-mL Schlenk tube and theresulting greenish-brown solution was stirred for 2.5 h at roomtemperature under slightly reduced pressure. Then the solution wasevaporated to dryness to give greenish-brown solid, which was extractedwith pentane (30 mL) and filtered through a cannula fitted with a doublelayer of filter paper. The resulting pentane solution was concentratedto a total volume of 8 mL and placed in a −50° C. freezer overnight.Greenish-brown crystals formed. They were isolated, dried in vacuo andredissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (20 mL). The resulting solution was cooled to 0°C. and chlorotrimethylsilane (2 mL, 15.8 mmol) was added via syringe.The turbid yellow solution was allowed to warm to room temperature,stirred for 1 h, concentrated to a total volume of 1 mL and then dilutedwith toluene (30 mL). The resulting suspension was stirred for 24 h. Thelemon yellow powdery solid was isolated and dried in vacuo (1.390 g,46%). ¹H NMR (20° C., CDCl₃, 400 MHz): 8.19-8.17 (br, 1H), 8.10 (br,2H), 7.99 (br, 1H), 7.83 (br, 1H), 7.77 (br, 1H), 7.61 (br, 2H), 7.53(appears as poorly resolved dd, 2H), 7.44-7.38 (br, 1H), 7.30 (br, 2H),7.20 (m, 1H), 7.03 (br, 2H), 6.95 (s, 1H), 6.83 (br, 1H), 2.45 (br, 6H),0.41 (s, 9H). Broad peaks in the aromatic region appear to indicate thepresence of dimerized or oligomerized forms of (bfmnPhIn)ZrCl₃. Inaddition, one NMe₂ group (2.45 ppm) and one SiMe₃ group (0.41 ppm) perevery two 2-bis(3′,5′-trifluromethyl)-phenylindenyl entities appear tobe coordinated to the metal. This material was used without furtherpurification.

Example 9.

Synthesis of(2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl)(1-methyl-2-phenylindenyl)zirconium dichloride, (Metallocene 8).

Butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 0.55 mL, 1.38 mmol) was added to thesolution of 1-methyl-2-phenylindene (277 mg, 1.31 mmol) in diethyl ether(25 mL) at −78° C. via syringe. The resulting light yellow solution wasallowed to warm to room temperature, stirred for an additional 15 min,and the ether was removed in vacuo to yield a white powdery solid whichwas combined with solid (2-(bis-3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl)zirconium trichloride·Me₃SiNMe₂ (695 mg, 1.31 mmol) and toluene (40 mL)at 0° C. The resulting dark green solution was allowed to warm to roomtemperature and stirred for 40 h during which time the color of thesolution gradually turned lemon-yellow. The turbid solution was filteredthrough a glass frit packed with Celite and then evaporated to dryness.Orange crystals were obtained from a CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL)/pentane (5 mL)solution stored at −50° C. (200 mg, 28%). ¹H NMR (20° C., CDCl₃, 500MHz): d 7.84 (s, 2H, br), 7.82 (s, 1H, br), 7.52 (t, 2H, J=7.5 Hz), 7.43(m, 3H), 7.36 (m, 2H), 7.29 (m, 2H), 7.20 (t, 1H, J=6.0 Hz), 7.08 (q,2H, J=7.0 Hz), 6.68 (d, 1H, J=2 Hz), 6.38 (d, 1H, J=2 Hz), 5.99 (s, 1H),5.32 (s, ⅓ H, CH ₂Cl₂), 2.53 (s, 3H). ¹³C {¹H} NMR (20° C., CDCl₃, 125MHz): d 135.48 (C), 133.20 (C), 132.23 (C), 132.20 (C), 131.62 (C—CF₃,²J_(C—F)=34 Hz), 130.23 (C), 129.03 (CH), 128.61 (CH), 128.44 (C—H),126.87 (C—H), 126.71 (C—H), 126.70 (C—H), 126.54 (C—H), 126.45 (C—H),126.24 (C—H), 125.90 (C), 125.17 (C—H), 125.01 (C), 124.43 (C), 124.15(C—H), 124.13 (C—H), 123.22 (CF3, J_(C—F)=272 Hz), 121.70 (C—H, br),102.09 (C—H, Cp), 101.20 (C—H, Cp), 98.51 (C—H, Cp), 12.39 (CH₃). Anal.Calcd (Found) for C₃₃H₂₂Cl₂F₆Zr×⅙·CH₂Cl₂: C 56.20 (56.11); H 3.18(3.09).

Example 10.

Synthesis of(2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl)(1-methyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl) zirconium dichloride, (Metallocene 9).

Butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 0.40 mL, 1.00 mmol) was added to thesolution of 2-(bis-3, 5-trifluoromethylphenyl)indene (328 mg, 0.958mmol) in diethyl ether (30 mL) at −78 ° C. via syringe. The resultinglight yellow solution was allowed to warm to room temperature, stirredfor additional 2.5 h and the ether was removed in vacuo to yield a graypowdery solid, which was washed with pentane, filtered, and dried invacuo. The solid was then combined with solid(2-(bis-3′,5′-trifluoromethylphenyl)indenyl) zirconiumtrichloride·Me₃SiNMe₂ (508 mg, 0.958 mmol) and toluene (50 mL) and thereaction mixture was stirred for 40 h at room temperature. The turbidyellow solution was filtered through a glass frit packed with Celite andthen evaporated to dryness. The resulting solid was extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (10 mL). The yellow methylene chloride solution was placed in a−50° C. freezer overnight and a yellow precipitate formed (100 mg, 13%).¹H NMR (20° C., C₆D₆, 500 MHz): d 7.56 (s, 2H, br), 7.48 (s, 2H, br),7.29 (d, 1H, J=8.5 Hz), 7.08 (m, 2H), 6.90 (m, 2H), 6.83 (t, 2H, J=7.0Hz), 6.66 (t, 1H, J=7.5 Hz), 6.00 (d, 1H, J=2.5 Hz), 5.73 (d, 1H, J=2.5Hz), 5.48 (s, 1H), 2.14 (s, 3H). ¹⁹F NMR (20° C., C₆D₆, 282 MHz): 63.65(s, 3F), 63.57 (s, 3F). ¹³C {¹H} NMR (20° C., CDCl₃, 125 MHz): d 135.61(C), 133.85 (C), 132.66 (C), 131.64 (C—CF₃, ²J_(C—F)=33 Hz), 131.44(C—CF₃, ²J_(C—F)=33 Hz), 130.78 (C), 129.03 (CH), 129.00 (CH), 127.85(C), 126.79 (CH), 126.63 (CH), 126.57 (CH), 126.35 (CH), 125.91 (CH),124.95 (CH), 124.74 (C), 124.59 (CH), 124.28 (CH), 123.50 (CF₃,J_(C—F)=273 Hz), 123.15 (CF₃, J_(C—F) 273 Hz), 122.83 (C), 122.09 (C),121.89 (CH, br), 121.42 (CH, br), 118.74 (C), 103.28 (CH, Cp), 100.28(CH, Cp), 99.57 (CH, Cp), 12.17 (CH₃). Anal. Calcd (Found) forC₃₅H₂₀Cl₂F₁₂Zr: C 50.61 (50.90); H 2.43 (2.72).

Example 11.

Synthesis of Bis(2-(bis-3,5-tert-butyl-4-methoxyphenyl) indenyl)zirconium dichloride (Metallocene 10).

A sample of 5.584 g (40 mmol) potassium carbonate and 6.3 mL (100 mmol)iodomethane were reacted with 2.554 g (10 mmol)bis-3,5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzoic acid and heated to 45° C. for 30 h.Flash chromatography of the crude product on silica gel with 7.5% etherin hexanes then recrystallisation from hexanes at −20° C. yieldedmethyl-bis-3,5-tert-butyl-4-methoxybenzoate. Yield: 2.213 g (7.95 mmol,80%). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): d 1.42 (s, 18H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 7.93(s, 2H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): d 31.91, 35.86, 51.93, 64.40, 124.35, 128.24,144.01, 163.84, 167.45. The methyl ester (8 mmol) was dissolved in 65 mLof THF in an addition funnel and added to a solution of the di-Grignardof o-xylylenedichloride solution at −78° C. over approx. 60 minutes,consistently maintaining the temperature below −70° C. during theaddition. The reaction mixture was warmed to 0° C. in 1-2 h and 80 mLdistilled water was added through the addition funnel in 15-30 minutes.After the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature theTHF was removed completely from the reaction mixture. The remainingsuspension was acidified to pH=1 and extracted with methylene chloride.The combined organic layers were dried over magnesium sulfate andstirred with 0.300 g (1.57 mmol) para-toluenesulfonic acid monohydratefor 1 h at room temperature. After extraction with distilled water anddrying over magnesium sulfate, the crude product was transferred tosilica gel and purified by flash chromatography. Yield 2.346 g (7.01mmol, 87%). ¹H NMR (CD₂Cl₂): d 1.47 (s, 18H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s,2H), 7.14 (s, 1H), 7.15 (td, J=7.0 Hz, J=0.8 Hz), 1H), 7.25 (t, J=7.5Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (s, 2H);¹³C NMR (CD₂Cl₂): d 32.18, 36.09, 39.47, 64.65, 120.88, 123.89, 124.41,124.68, 125.36, 126.87, 130.67, 143.53, 144.24, 146.05, 147.55, 159.94.

A sample of 1.5 mmol of 2-(bis-3,5-tert-butyl-4-methoxyphenyl)indene wasdissolved in 50 mL of diethylether. The solution was cooled down to 0°C. and 0.6 mL (1.5 mmol) n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes) was addeddropwise via syringe. The cooling bath was removed and the mixture wasstirred at ambient temperature for 10 h and evacuated to dryness.Zirconium tetrachloride, 175 mg (0.75 mmol), and 100 mL toluene wasadded and the reaction mixture stirred virgorously at 25° C. for 3 days.Toluene was removed in vacuo and 50 mL methylene chloride added. Thesuspension was filtered over celite through a Schlenk-frit under argonand washed with methylene chloride until the filtered liquid remainedcolorless. The resulting clear solutions volume was reduced to ¼ to ⅕and a layer of pentane, hexanes or diethylether was applied carefully.The layered solution was stored at −80° C. for crystallization of theproduct. Yield: 293 mg (0.353 mmol, 36%), yellow solid. ¹H NMR (CD₂Cl₂):d 1.56 (s, 36H), 3.82 (s, 6H), ), 6.64-6.68 (m, 4H), 6.72 (s, 4H),6.98-7.01 (m, 4H), 7.63 (s, 4H); ¹³C NMR (CD₂Cl₂): d 32.16, 36.13,64.67, 104.50, 124.32, 125.48, 126.11, 126.40, 127.03, 129.51, 144.65,160.45. Anal. Calcd for C₄₈H₅₈Cl₂O₂Zr: C, 69.54; H, 7.05. Found: C,69.41; H, 7.24.

General Polymerization Procedures:

METHOD A.

Copolymerization of Ethylene and Propylene (<50 mole % E).

A 300-mL stainless steel Parr reactor was charged with liquid propylene(100 mL). Propylene was cooled to the reaction temperature andpressurized with ethylene. The monomer mixture was equilibrated at thereaction temperature under constant ethylene pressure for at least 20min. Immediately prior to the catalyst injection the ethylene line wasdisconnected and the reactor was cooled to 2-3° C. below the reactiontemperature to compensate for the anticipated exothermic effect ofcatalyst injection. In a nitrogen filled drybox a 50-mL pressure tubewas charged with zirconocene/MAO solution in toluene (20 mL), removedfrom the box and pressurized with argon (250 psig). In the case ofpolymerizations at 0-2° C. the catalyst injection tube was cooled in anice bath prior to being injected. The reaction was started by catalystinjection. After catalyst injection, the ethylene line was reconnectedand the reaction was run for 15-60 min at constant total pressure andtemperature. The reaction was quenched by injecting MeOH (20 mL). Thepolymer was precipitated in acidified MeOH (5% HCl), filtered, washedwith MeOH and dried in a vacuum oven at 40° C. to constant weight.

METHOD B.

Copolymerization of Ethylene and Propylene (>60 mole % E).

A 300-mL Parr autoclave was charged with 60 mL of liquid propylene andcooled to the reaction temperature. MAO, dissolved in 10 mL of toluene,was injected under ethylene pressure and the reactor was allowed toequilibrate for 10-15 min. Polymerization was initiated by injecting thecorresponding zirconocene dichloride solution in 10 mL of toluene underethylene pressure set to 30-40 psi above the head pressure ofpreequlibrated ethylene/propylene mixture in the reactor. Polymerizationwas conducted for 25 min and quenched by injecting 10 mL of methanolunder Ar pressure. The reactor was slowly vented and opened. Thecopolymer was precipitated in acidified methanol (5% HCl), filtered,washed with methanol and dried in a vacuum oven at 40° C. to constantweight.

METHOD C.

Ethylene-Hexene Copolymerization.

The metallocene was dissolved in 25 mL of toluene in the N₂ dry box.Methylaluminoxane (MAO) was dissolved in 35 mL of 1-hexene. The MAOsolution was loaded into a 150 mL 2-ended injection tube. Meanwhile, a300 mL stainless steel Parr reactor was evacuated to 100 mtorr andrefilled with Ar. The reactor was flushed three times with 50 psig Arand then 129 psig ethylene. The MAO solution was introduced to thereactor and was allowed to equilibrate with under the desired headpressure of ethylene for 30 min. 1 -Hexene (3.2 mL) and an aliquot ofmetallocene stock solution (1.8 mL) was introduced to a 25 mL 2-endedinjection tube. The ethylene feed was disconnected from the reactor andthe pressure was vented by 10 psig. The metallocene solution wasinjected under the desired head pressure of ethylene to start thereaction. The ethylene feed was immediately reconnected to the reactor.The temperature was controlled at 18° C. throughout the reaction via anethylene glycolwater cooling loop. The reaction was quenched withmethanol injected under Ar pressure after 1 h. The reactor was ventedand the copolymer was collected and stirred with acidified methanolovernight. The copolymer was then rinsed with methanol and dried toconstant weight in a vacuum oven at 40° C.

METHOD D.

Ethylene Homopolymerization.

The homopolymerization procedure was identical to that employed incopolymerizations. However, hexane was substituted for 1-hexene as thereaction solvent.

Ethylene-Propylene Copolymer Characterization.

Copolymer composition and monomer sequence distribution were determinedusing ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. Copolymer samples (180-300 mg) weredissolved in 2.5 mL of o-dichlorobenzene/10 vol. % benzene-d₆ in 10 mmtubes. The spectra were measured at 140° C. using pulse repetitionintervals of 13 s and gated proton decoupling. The isotacticity ofpropylene triads (% mm) was determined from the ratio of integrals ofthe first triplet in the methyl region (all P^(m)P^(m)P centered triads)over T_(γγ)peak (all PPP triads). The glass transition, melting pointsand heats of fusion were determined by differential scanning calorimetryusing Perkin-Elmer DSC-7. The DSC scans were obtained by first heatingcopolymer samples to 160° C. for 20 min, cooling them to 20° C. over 2h, ageing them at room temperature for 24 h and then reheating from−100° C. to 200° C. at 20° C./min. All DSC values in the tables arereheat values. Infrared spectra were obtained by transmission onmelt-pressed films using a Perkin-Elmer 1600 FTIR spectrometer. The IRratio =A₉₉₃/A₉₇₅, calculated from the absorptivities at 993 and 975cm⁻¹, was averaged over at least three measurements taken in differentregions of the film.

Ethylene-1-Hexene Copolymer Characterization.

Copolymer composition and monomer sequence distribution were determinedusing ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. Copolymer samples (180-300 mg) weredissolved in 2.5 mL of o-dichlorobenzene/10 vol. % benzene-d₆ in 10 mmtubes. Approximately 5 mg of chromium acetylacetonate was added tosamples to decrease spin relaxation times. The spectra were measured at100° C. using pulse repetition intervals of 5 s and gated protondecoupling. The glass transition, melting points and heats of fusionwere determined by differential scanning calorimetry using aPerkin-Elmer DSC-7. The DSC scans were obtained by first heatingcopolymer samples to 200° C. for 10 min, cooling them to 20° C. at 20°C. per minute, aging them at room temperature for 24 h and thenreheating from 0° C. to 200° C. at 20° C./min. All DSC values in thetables are reheat values. Scans to determine the glass transitiontemperature were obtained by cooling the sample to −150° C. and thenheating to 0° C. at 40° C./min.

Mechanical tests were performed at 23° C. with ASTM D-1708 dumbellspecimens (2.2 cm gauge length) which were die cut from compressionmolded sheets of about 0.05 cm thickness. Crosshead separation rate was25.4 cm/min for the three cycle 100% elongation test and 51 cm/min forthe tensile and stress relaxation tests.

Tensile tests were run according to ASTM D638-96. Tensile modulus ofelasticity was determined as the tangent slope at lowest strain.Elongation after break (percent elongation following break) was measuredfrom benchmarks as immediate set of the center 10 mm section of thespecimen. The three cycle recovery test was performed by extension ofthe specimen three times to 100% elongation with a 30 second hold ateach extension and a 60 second hold at each recovery. Cumulative setafter the first two cycles was measured from the strain at which stressexceeds the baseline on the third cycle. A stress relaxation test wasalso conducted by extension to 50% elongation and measuring the decay ofthe stress.

Examples 12-17.

Propylene Homopolymerization with Metallocenes 2, 4, 6-9.

The homopolymerization of propylene was carried out by Method A; resultsare reported in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Propylene Polymerization with (2-Arylindenyl) Zirconocenes(2,4,6-9/MAO).^(a) M_(w) Ex. Catalyst^(b) Productivity^(c) % m^(4d) ×10^(−3 e) MWD^(e) ΔH_(m) ^(f) 12 2/MAO 2 530 32 542 3.48 28 13 4/MAO 1180 72 580 4.66 81 14 6/MAO 2 800 14 293 3.77 — 15 7/MAO 1 350 31 2174.44 35 16 8/MAO 1 810 24 262 3.74 26 17 9/MAO 1 030 47 270 6.50 57^(a)Reaction conditions: bulk propylene, 20° C., [Zr] = 50 mM, [Zr]:[Al]= 1:1000, t_(rxn) = 30 min.; ^(b)2 = (PhInd)₂ZrCl₂, 4 = (bfmPhIn)₂ZrCl₂,6 = (PhInd)(1MePhInd)ZrCl₂, 7 = (PhInd)(1MebfmPhIn)ZrCl₂, 8 =(bfmPhIn)(1MePhInd)ZrCl₂, 9 = (bfmPhIn)(1MebfmPhIn)ZrCl₂; ^(c)(kg ·PP)/(mol · Zrh); ^(d)determined by ¹³C NMR; ^(e)determined by GPC;^(f)determined by DSC

Examples 18-26.

Ethylene/Propylene Copolymerization with Metallocenes 1 and 4.

The copolymerization of ethylene and propylene was carried out accordingto Method B to give copolymers with ethylene contents of 60-75%; theresults are reported in Table 2. Examples 18-20 are comparative examplesprepared with a stereorigid metallocene 1; Examples 21-26 are carriedout with catalysts of the present invention. Note the melting range forpolymers prepared by catalysts of the present invention are broader andthe heats of fusion higher than polymers produced by comparative bridgedcatalyst 1.

TABLE 2 Ethylene/Propylene Copolymerization with Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂ 1/MAO and(bfmPhIn)₂ZrCl₂ 4/MAO.^(a) Melting ΔH_(m), Ex. Catalyst^(b) T_(pol), °C. % E^(c) range, ° C.^(d) T_(m), ° C.^(d) J/g^(d) 18 1/MAO 0 66110-132  124 0.55 19 1/MAO 0 68 110-134  127 1.9 20 1/MAO 0 75 110-134 125 0.17^(e) 21 4/MAO^(f) 2 61 31-130 45, 118 14.5^(f) 75-136 1237.1^(g) 22 4/MAO^(f) 1 64 31-129 45, 119 16.8^(g) 40-130 123 13.5^(e) 234/MAO^(f) 0 67 60-136 122 3.4 24 4/MAO^(f) 0 69 28-133 45, 119 17.6^(g)40-132 122 15.4^(e) 25 4/MAO^(f) 0 69 30-131 42, 120 4.8 26 4/MAO^(f) 2360 27-126 44, 115 5.4 30-127 44, 115 14.1^(e) ^(a)Conditions: [Zr] = 1-2mM, [MAO]:[Zr] = 10 000, t_(rxn) = 25 mm, 60 mL liq. P. DSC samplepreparation: annealed at 160-180° C. for 20 min, cooled to 25° C. over 2h, aged for 24-36 h if not otherwise specified. ^(b)1 = Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂, 4= (bfmPbIn)₂ZrCl₂, ^(c)Mole % ethylene determined by ¹³C NMRspectroscopy. ^(d)Determined by DSC. ^(e)Baseline curved, error may bepresent in peak area determination. ^(f)Two shown values correspond totwo runs on different DSC samples prepared from the same polymer sample.^(g)Samples aged for 1 mo.

Examples 27-79.

Copolymerization of Ethylene and Propylene with Metallocenes 1, 2, 4,6-9.

Ethylene/Propylene Copolymerizations were carried out according toMethod A; results are reported in Tables 3 and 4.

TABLE 3 First Order Markov Copolymerization Parameters for 1, 2, 4, 6-9/MAO. X_(e)/X_(p) in % E in Ex. Cat.^(a) T ° C. N_(exp) ^(b) feed^(c)polymer^(d) r_(e)r_(p) ^(e) r_(e) ^(e) r_(p) ^(e) 27 1/MAO 1 ± 1 5 0.04− 0.18 23 − 54 0.49 ± 0.03 5.4 ± 0.6 0.09 ± 0.01 28 1/MAO 20 ± 1 1 0.0742 0.50 7.1 0.07 29 2/MAO  1 ± 1 5 0.06 − 0.22 21 − 44 0.92 ± 0.08 3.8 ±0.3 0.25 ± 0.01 30 2/MAO 20 ± 1 5 0.06 − 0.16 23 − 45 1.3 ± 0.2 5.4 ±0.9 0.24 ± 0.04 31 4/MAO  1 ± 1 5 0.07 − 0.25 18 − 43 1.3 ± 0.1 4.2 ±0.7 0.31 ± 0.03 32 4/MAO 20 ± 1 5 0.05 − 0.08 14 − 22 1.9 ± 0.1 6.0 ±0.2 0.33 ± 0.03 33 6/MAO  1 ± 1 1 0.09 30 1.32 6.3 0.21 34 6/MAO 19 ± 12 0.08 − 0.13 34 − 41 1.14 ± 0.01 6.4 ± 0.6 0.18 ± 0.02 35 7/MAO  0 ± 14 0.04 − 0.27 15 − 62 1.49 ± 0.30 7.0 ± 0.39 0.21 ± 0.03 36 7/MAO 19 ± 13 0.04 − 0.13 20 − 45 1.34 ± 0.22 8.6 ± 1.3 0.15 ± 0.01 37 8/MAO  0 ± 11 0.26 34 1.77 2.9 0.62 38 8/MAO 18 ± 1 3 0.08 − 0.11 33 − 42 1.66 ±0.04 9.0 ± 0.2 0.19 ± 0.01 39 9/MAO  0 ± 1 2 0.03 − 0.08 28 − 64 1.80 ±0.26 7.3 ± 0.5 0.25 ± 0.03 40 9/MAO 20 ± 1 5 0.05 − 0.13 31 − 48 1.72 ±0.35 10.8 ± 2.7 0.16 ± 0.02 ^(a)1 = Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂, 2 = (PhInd)₂ZrCl₂, 4= (bfmPhIn)₂ZrCl₂, 6 = (PhInd)(1MePhInd)ZrCl₂, 7 =(PhInd)(1MebfmPhIn)ZrCl₂, 8 = (bfmPhIn)(1MePhInd)ZrCl₂, 9 =(bfmPhIn)(1MebfmPhIn)ZrCl₂; ^(b)number of experiments used fordetermination of the average reactivity ratios; ^(c)the range of theratios of the mole fractions of ethylene (Xe) and propylene (Xp);^(d)the range of mole % E in copolymers determined using ¹³C NMR;^(e)determined using ¹³C NMR

Note that the product of the reactivity ratios (r_(e)·r_(p)) formetallocenes of the present invention are in the range1.1<r_(e) r_(p)<1.8 whereas those for comparative metallocene 1 are lessthan 1 (r_(e)·r_(p)=0.5).

TABLE 4 Ethylene-Propylene Copolymers Generated with Catalysts 1,2,4 and6-9/MAO.^(a) T_(pol), Tg, Melt Δ H_(m), Mw Ex. Catalyst^(b) ° C. % E^(c)° C.^(d) range, ° C. T_(m), ° C. J/g •10^(−3e) MWD^(e) 41 1/MAO 0 0 —20-160 143 125 70.6 2.0 42 1/MAO 2 11 −28 26-122 89 63 89.4 2.3 43 1/MAO2 23 −39 25-90 58 9.3 78.1 2.1 44 1/MAO 2 42 −52 none none none 75.2 2.045 2/MAO 20 0 −8 30-160 140 31 542 3.5 46 2/MAO 20 9 −26 30-110 65 8 1547 5.5 47 2/MAO 20 24 −26 none none none 1 312 3.6 48 4/MAO 0 0 —20-160 147 100 756 5.7 49 4/MAO 2 9 −21 31-122 100 23 2 397 5.4 50 4/MAO1 21 −31 31-142 45 2.2 2 292 4.2 51 4/MAO 1 33 −40 none none none 2 2352.6 52 4/MAO 0 67 — 60-136 122 3.4 53 6/MAO 20 0 — none none none 2933.8 54 6/MAO 18 34 −34 none none none 596 5.3 55 6/MAO 19 41 — none nonenone 633 5.2 56 6/MAO 1 30 −33 none none none 1 225 3.1 57 7MAO 20 0 −330-157 140 35 217 4.4 58 7MAO 18 20 −22 28-80 50 3.6 334 6.0 59 7MAO 1823 −25 26-84 46 5.6 60 7MAO 19 29 −31 29-120 48 3.4 488 5.6 61 7MAO 1945 — none none none 342 3.7 62 7MAO 1 0 −4 30-159 140 32.2 367 3.3 637MAO 0 15 −16 55-109 66 2.6 655 3.4 64 7MAO 1 36 −36 none none none 8453.1 65 7MAO 1 62 — 27-130 118 8.3 869 3.4 66 8/MAO 20 0 −3 30-158 145 26262 3.7 67 8/MAO 17 33 — none none none 68 8/MAO 19 42 — none none none515 4.3 69 8/MAO 0 34 — none none none 907 3.2 70 9MAO 20 0 −2.6 20-163148 57 270 6.5 71 9MAO 20 31 — 61-125 73, 115 2.4 500 10.2 72 9MAO 20 33−33 44-128 117 4.2 450 6.2 73 9MAO 20 38 — 52-124 62, 115 2.0 558 6.8 749MAO 20 43 — 39-126 116 1.75 495 8.8 75 9MAO 19 48 −43 21-123 47, 1157.5 385 5.9 76 9MAO 20 70 −52 64-126 117 2.9 611 5.0 77 9MAO 0 28 −2730-81 51 4.7 781 4.2 78 9MAO 0 64 −48 35-125 115 3.5 673 3.7 ^(a)DSCsample preparation: annealed at 160-180° C. for 20 min, cooled to 25° C.over 2 h, aged for 36 h; ^(b)1 = Et(Ind)₂ ZrCl₂, 2 = (PhInd)₂ ZrCl₂, 4 =(bfmPhIn)₂ ZrCl₂, 6 (PhInd)(1MePhInd)ZrCl₂, 7 =(PhInd)(1MebfmPbIn)ZrCl₂, 8 = (bfmPbIn)(1MePhInd) ZrCl₂, # 9 =(bfmPhIn)(1MebfmPhIn)ZrCl₂; ^(c)Mole % E determined by ¹³C NMRspectroscopy; ^(d)Half Cp extrapolated; ^(e)Determined by hightemperature GPC.

Note that polymers prepared with metallocene 1 containing 42% ethylene(Example 44) are amorphous, whereas polymers of similar composition(48%E) derived from metallocene 9 (Example 75) are crystalline andexhibit a melting range of 21-123° C. with a heat of fusion of 7.5 J/g.Also note that propylene polymers obtained from metallocene 1 containing23% ethylene exhibit a melting range of 25-90° C. and ΔH_(m)=9.5 J/g(Example 43) whereas propylene polymers containing as much as 33% Ederived from metallocene 9 show higher melting range of 44-128° C. withΔH_(m)=4.2 J/g (Example 72).

The compositional heterogeneity of the copolymer sample of Example 78was investigated by extraction in boiling heptane. The microstructuresof the heptane soluble (50 wt %) and insoluble (50 wt %) fractions ofExample 78 were analyzed by Solution ¹³C NMR spectroscopy (Table 5). Theethylene contents (%E) of the fractions differ by 3% or less and thereactivity ratios calculated from the dyad distribution differ by lessthan 0.16 from the average of the whole polymer sample, clearlyindicating the compositional homogeneity of these copolymers.

TABLE 5 Fractionation of Ethylene Propylene Copolymer from Metallocene 9Example Sample % Wt % E^(a) r_(e)r_(p) 78 Whole 100 64 1.54 HS 50 611.46 HI 50 64 1.70 ^(a)determined by solution ¹³C NMR b) HS = heptanessoluble c) HI = heptanes insoluble

Examples 79-104.

The copolymerization of ethylene and 1-hexene was carried out withmetallocenes 1, 2, 4, 5 and 9-10 by Method C. The data andcharacteristics of the polymers are reported in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Summary of the DSC and Molecular Weight Data forEthylene-1-Hexene Copolymers Generated with Catalysts 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 and10/MAO.^(a) T_(pol), Tg, melt range, Δ H_(m), Mw Ex. Cat.^(b) ° C. %E^(c) ° C.^(d) ° C.^(a) Tm, ° C.^(a) J/g^(a) •10^(−3e) MWD^(e) 79 1/MAO19 54 −72 none none 0 53 2.2 80 1/MAO 18 65 −76 none none 0 52 2.1 811/MAO 19 69 — none none 0 61 2.2 82 1/MAO 18 77 −77 37-45 43 0.3 75 2.483 1/MAO 18 81 −74 33-43 40 4.7 71 2.2 84 2/MAO 18 54 −68 none none 01176 3.2 85 2/MAO 18 59 — none none 0 1353 5.5 86 2/MAO 18 64 −72 nonenone 0 1474 7.4 87 4/MAO 18 44 — none none 0 554 7.4 88 4/MAO 18 55 —26-126 116 2.7 691 6.3 89 4/MAO 18 62 — 28-130 40, 120 8.0 994 7.6 904/MAO 18 66 — 61-81 63, 114 3.5 783 6.7 82-124 91 4/MAO 18 70 — 29-7538, 121 4.2 1076 9 76-126 92 4/MAO 18 73 — 23-130 37, 119 16 826 6.3 934/MAO 80 −70 16-116 25, 86 15.7 1164 6.1 94 4/MAO 89 −59 11-117 20, 10531 1318 4.6 95 4/MAO 18 100  — 100-145 133 136 1534 4.7 96 3/MAO 18 49 —none none 0 1793 2.8 97 3/MAO 18 62 — 30-50 40 1.0 1287 4.8 98 9/MAO 1868 — 14-63 23, 96 2.7 646 5.1 79-114 99 9/MAO 18 70 — 40-68 22, 108 5.4700 4.8 92-120 100 9/MAO 18 76 — 20-67 23, 107 4.0 901 5.8 78-114 1019/MAO 18 79 — 15-43 20, 106 8.4 825 4.7 79-114 102 10/MAO 18 48 — nonenone 0 1193 4.1 103 10/MAO 18 55 −74 34-127 117 4.0 1335 7.8 104 10/MAO17 64 −74 29-135 117 5.2 1758 7.9 ^(a)DSC sample preparation: annealedat 200° C. for 10 min, cooled to 25° C. at 20° C./min, aged 24 h. ^(b)1= Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂, 2 = (PhInd)₂ZrCl₂, 4 = (bfmPhIn)₂ZrCl₂, 3 =(PhInd)₂HfCl₂, 9 = (bfmPhIn)(1MebfmPhIn)ZrCl₂, 10 = (DTBM)₂ZrCl₂.^(c)Mole % E determined by ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. ^(d)Half Cpextrapolated (DSC). ^(e) Determined by high temperature GPC.

As indicated in Table 6, Comparative Examples 79-83, carried out withbridged metallocene 1 yields random ethylene/hexene copolymers. Polymersmade with this metallocene containing 54-69 mol % ethylene areamorphous, exhibiting no melting point by DSC analysis as indicated by“none” under the melt range and T_(m) columns. In contrast, metallocene4 of the present invention yields polymers containing 55-70% ethylenewith melting points ranging from 26-130° C.

The properties of the ethylene/hexene copolymers of Example 92 and 93are compared to representative other comparable polyolefin elastomersand reported in Table 7, Parts I and II. Comparative Example 105 is acommercial Ethylene/Octene Elastomer obtained from Dow (Engage 8200™),Comparative Example 106 is an Ethylene/Butene Elastomer obtained fromExxon (Exact 4033™), and comparative Example 107 is a polypropyleneelastomer as described in Waymouth et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,594,080.

TABLE 7 Part I Mechanical Properties of Polyolefin Elastomers. Comp. ExComp. Ex Comp. Ex Ex. 92 Ex. 93 Ex. 94 105 106 107 Polymer Engage Exactpolypropylene 8200 4033 37% mmmm Comonomer Hexene Hexene Hexene OcteneButene None Mole % Ethylene 73 80 89 87 89 0 PE Melt Index nd nd nd 5.00.8 Mw (× 10³) 826 1164 1318 77.4 nd 386 T_(m) range (° C.) 23-13016-116 11-117 20-70 20-70 40-160 T_(m) peak (° C.) 119 25, 86 20-105 6664 148 ΔH_(m) (J/g) 16.2 15.6 31 10.5 13.7 T_(g) (° C.)^(a) — −66 −60−54 — Density (g/cc) 0.8682 0.8694 0.8819 0.87 0.88 0.8663 Tensile 3.64.2 8.8 9.6 16.9 12.3 Strength (MPa) Tensile 2.9 4.0 10.3 6.9 12.3 8.9Modulus (MPa) Elongation at 565 ± 62 428 360 1130 750 830 Break (%)Elongation  90 ± 17 26 57 300 210 34 after Break (%) 100% Elongation 3Cycle Test: % stress 33 17 17 23 23 39 relaxation, 30 s, 1st cycle %retained force, 24 41 29 28 20 29 2nd cycle % set, cumulative 19 13 1313 11 7 Stress Relaxation Test 50% elongation, 51 33 25 28 28 48 5 min^(a)Determined by Dynamic Mechanical Analysis.

As evident from Table 7, all polyolefin elastomers have a similardensity and comparable elastomeric properties. However, the copolymerelastomers of Example 92 and 93 have a particularly useful combinationof properties that includes a low glass transition temperature(T_(g)=−70° C.) and melting ranges that extend to 130° C. Note inparticular that while the copolymers of Example 92, and comparativeExamples 105 and 106 have similar degrees of crystallinity as manifestedby their heats of fusion (ΔH_(f)(J/g) from 10.5-16.2), the melting pointof the copolymer of Example 92 is 119° C. It is unexpected that thishigh melting point is acheived at a much lower mol % ethylene (73 mol %versus 87 or 89 mol %).

The compositional hetereogeneity of these copolymers was investigated byextracting the copolymers in boiling ether and hexanes. The results ofthese fractionation experiments on the copolymer samples of Example 90and 91 are reported in Table 8.

TABLE 8 Fractionation of Ethylene/Hexene Copolymers from Metallocene 4Example Sample % Wt % E^(a) T_(m), ° C. Melt Range, ° C. 90 Whole 100 6663, 114 61-81, 82-124 ES^(b) 16 59 42 35-50  El 84 72 41, 118 29-126EI/HxS^(c) 80 69 45 25-85  91 Whole 100 70 39, 119 29-75, 76-126 ES^(b)23 63 35 30-43  EI^(c) 77 73 35, 119 24-129 EI/HxS^(c) 64 67 34, 11927-126 HxI^(e) 13 75 35, 59, 117 24-128 ^(a)determined by solution ¹³CNMR. ^(b)ES = diethylether soluble. ^(c)EI/HxS = diethyletherinsoluble/hexane soluble. ^(d)HxI = hexane insoluble.

Note that the mole fraction of ethylene in the various fractions of thecopolymer are all within 10% of the mean mole percent ethylene of thecopolymer sample, indicating that these materials have a narrowcomposition distribution.

Example 108.

Synthesis of[1-Benzyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-tert-butyl)phenylindenyl](2-Phenylindenyl)zirconium dichloride (Metallocene 11)

3,5-Di-tert-butylbenzoic acid (2 g, 8.5 mmol) was dissolved in methanol(50 ml). Thionyl chloride (0.94 ml, 13 mmol) was added at 0° C. Themixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 hours. The solvent wasremoved under vacuum, and the residual solid,methyl-bis-3,5-tert-butylbenzoate, was used without purification (1.92g, 91%). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 1.33 (18H, s), 3.89 (3H, s), 7.60 (1H, m),7.87 (2H, m). ¹³C{¹H}NMR (CDCl₃): δ 31.35, 34.92, 51.98, 123.76, 127.05,129.49, 150.99, 167.80.

Magnesium powder (1.65 g, 68 mmol) was activated with 1,2-dibromoethane(0.366 ml, 4.25 mmol) in THF (15 ml). The solvent was removed undervacuum. THF (125 ml) was used to dissolve o-xylylene dichloride (3 g, 17mmol), and the solution was added dropwise to the activated magnesium atroom temperature over 2 hours. The solution was stirred at roomtemperature for 16 hours. Methyl-bis-3,5-tert-butylbenzoate (2.81 g,11.3 mmol) was dissolved in THF (125 ml) and added dropwise to theGrignard solution over 2 hours at −78° C. The mixture was warmed to roomtemperature and stirred for 16 hours. Water was added to quench excessGrignard and the solution was acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH ˜1.The product was extracted with ether, dried over MgSO₄, and the solventwas removed under vacuum. The solid was dissolved in toluene,p-toluenesulfonic acid (0.44 g, 2.6 mmol) was added, and the solutionwas refluxed for 3 hours. The mixture was washed with water, and thewater layer was extracted with ether. The organic layers were combinedand dried with MgSO₄. Solvent was removed under vacuum. The solidresidue, 2-(bis-3′,5′-tert-butyl) phenylindene, was purified by flashchromatography in pentane (2.95 g, 85%).¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 1.39 (18H, s),3.84 (2H, s), 7.1-7.5 (7H, m). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 31.46, 34.89,39.22, 119.97, 120.78, 122.03, 123.58, 124.48, 126.03, 126.53, 135.23,143.17, 145.56, 147.55, 150.99.

2-(bis-3′,5′-tert-butyl)phenylindene (1 g, 3.28 mmol) was deprotonatedwith n-butyllithium (2.1 ml, 3.36 mmol) in THF at −78° C., and stirredat room temperature for 2 hours. Benzyl bromide (1.2 ml, 10 mmol) wasadded slowly to the solution, and the mixture was stirred at 40° C. for24 hours. Solvent was removed under vacuum, and methanol was added tothe yellowish residue. The mixture was filtered through a medium glassfrit, and the white solid,1-benzyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-tert-butyl)phenylindene, Ligand E, was washedseveral times with methanol and then dried (0.8 g, 62%). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃):δ 1.27 (18H, s), 3.93 (2H, s), 4.18 (2H, s), 7-7.6 (12H, m). ¹³C{¹H} NMR(CDCl₃): δ 31.34, 32.20, 34.81, 41.33, 119.81, 121.29, 122.27, 123.35,124.57, 125.93, 126.37, 128.19, 128.46, 135.83, 136.07, 139.57, 142.56,143.94, 146.86, 150.77.

1-benzyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-tert-butyl)phenylindene (0.5 g, 1.27 mmol) wasdeprotonated with n-butyllithium (0.8 ml, 1.27 mmol) in ether at 0° C.,and stirred at room temperature for 3 hours. The solvent was removedunder vacuum, and (2-phenylindenyl)zirconium trichloride (0.494 g, 1.27mmol) was added. Toluene (50 ml) was added and the reaction was stirredat room temperature for 18 hours. The mixture was Schlenk-filteredthrough Celite, and the solvent was pumped off under vacuum. The productwas isolated by adding pentane to the residue, and then increasing thesolubility of the product by adding a small amount of toluene. Theproduct,[1-benzyl-2-(bis-3′,5′-tert-butyl)phenylindenyl](2-phenylindenyl)zirconiumdi-chloride, was isolated as a bright yellow powder (0.179 g, 19%). ¹HNMR (C₆D₆): δ 1.40 (18H, s), 4.63 (1H, d, J_(HH)=16.8 Hz), 4.78 (1H, d,J_(HH)=16.8 Hz), 5.95 (1H, s), 6.25 (1H, d, J_(HH)=2.2Hz), 6.56 (1H, d,J_(HH)=2.2Hz), 6.8-7.6(21H, m). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 31.49, 32.72,35.00, 100.53, 101.75, 105.09, 122.20, 122.44, 123.64, 124.35, 124.50,125.00, 125.39, 125.756, 126.04, 126.32, 126.37, 126.50, 126.53, 126.70,128.07, 128.20, 128.69, 128.83, 132.72, 133.35, 133.83, 139.87, 150.90.Anal. Calc. (Found) for C₄₅H₄₄Cl₂Zr: C 72.36 (72.01), H 5.94 (6.17).

Example 109.

Propylene Homopolymerization with Metallocene 11.

In a 300 ml stainless steel Parr reactor, 150 mg MAO in 8 ml toluene wasequilibrated for 30 minutes at 20° C., with 90 ml liquid propylene. Asolution of metallocene (2.68×10⁻⁶ mol) in toluene (2 ml) was injectedinto the reactor via argon pressure (250 psig). The polymerization wasrun for 20 minutes and then quenched with methanol (10 ml). Thepolypropylene was precipitated from acidified methanol, filtered, washedwith methanol, and dried under vacuum at 40° C.

The catalyst productivity was 312 kg/mol^(·)Zr^(·)h. The isotacticityindex (% m⁴) was 24%, as determined by ¹³C NMR. The melting range of thepolypropylene was 30-155° C. (peak melting temperature, T_(m)=135° C.),and the heat of fusion (ΔH_(m)) was 17.4 J/g, as determined by DSC. Thenumber average and weight average molecular weights, M_(n)=25 400 andM_(w)=73 100, and the polydispersity, PDI=2.9, were determined by GPC.

Examples 110-115.

Ethylene/Propylene Copolymerization with Metallocene 11.

The ethylene/propylene copolymerizations were carried out as follows. Ina 300 ml stainless steel Parr reactor, 100 mg MAO in 18 ml toluene wasequilibrated for 30 minutes at 20° C., with 100 ml liquid propylene andgaseous ethylene overhead pressure. Metallocene solution (2 ml intoluene) was injected into the reactor via ethylene pressure, and thepolymerization was run for 20 minutes, after which methanol (10 ml) wasinjected to quench the reaction. The ethylene/propylene copolymer wasprecipitated from acidified methanol, filtered, washed with methanol,and dried under vacuum at 40° C. The results of these copolymerizationsare given in Table 9, and the DSC traces are shown in FIG. 3.

TABLE 9 Ethylene/Propylene Copolymerization with Metallocene(1BztBu)(2PhInd)ZrCl₂, 11/MAO Productivity Tm^(d) ΔH^(d) M_(n) ^(e)M_(w) ^(e) Ex. % E^(a) (kg/mol⁻Zr·h) X_(e)/X_(p) ^(b) r_(e) ^(c) r_(p)^(c) r_(e)r_(p) ^(c) (° C.) (J/g) (×10⁻³) (×10⁻³) PDI^(e) 110 40 19200.08 13.7 0.18 2.5 35-60 (45) 2.1 — — — 111 45 1030 0.11 12.2 0.19 2.335-80 (49) 5.2 — — — 112 50 2360 0.13 12.7 0.18 2.2 35-80 (71) 6.2 109343 3.2 113 55 4630 0.15 12.9 0.18 2.3 35-90 (78) 7.6 — — — 114 60 79000.18 12.1 0.18 2.2 35-95 (84) 8.0 — — — 115 100 3450 — — — — 139 163 169780 4.6 ^(a)Mole % ethylene in the polymer, determined by ¹³C NMR.^(b)Ratio of mole fractions of ethylene and propylene in the feed.^(c)Reactivity ratios of ethylene (r_(e)), propylene (r_(p)), and theirproduct (r_(e)r_(p)), determined by ¹³C NMR. ^(d)Determined by DSC.Samples aged for 36 hours. Numbers in parentheses are peak meltingtemperatures. ^(e)Determined by GPC.

Examples 116-124.

Ethylene/1-Hexene Copolymerization with Metallocene 11.

The ethylene/propylene copolymerizations were carried out as follows. Ina 300 ml stainless steel Parr reactor, 100 mg MAO in 35 ml 1-hexene wasequilibrated for 30 minutes at 20° C., with gaseous ethylene overheadpressure. Catalyst solution (5 ml in toluene/1-hexene) was injected intothe reactor via ethylene pressure, and the polymerization was run for 20minutes, and then quenched with methanol (10 ml). The ethylene/1-hexenecopolymer was precipitated from acidified methanol, filtered, washedwith methanol, and dried under vacuum at 40° C. The results of thesecopolymerizations are given in Table 10, and the DSC traces are shown inFIG. 4.

TABLE 10 Ethylene/1-Hexene Copolymerization with Metallocene(1BztBu)(2PhInd)ZrCl₂, 11/MAO Productivity Tm^(d) ΔH^(d) M_(n) ^(e)M_(w) ^(e) Ex. % E^(a) (kg/mol·Zr·h) X_(e)/X_(h) ^(b) r_(e) ^(c) r_(h)^(c) r_(e)r_(h) ^(c) (° C.) (J/g) (×10⁻³) (×10⁻³) PDI^(e) 116 49 12600.06 22.2 0.08 1.8 30-65 0.9 33.3 135 4.1 (42) 117 61 2100 0.08 26.30.07 1.9 28-80 5.2 56.5 214 3.8 (39) 118 68 2380 0.11 24.7 0.08 1.825-90 10.7 77.9 278 3.6 (36, 73) 119 72 4160 0.15 23.2 0.08 1.9 25-9514.2 — — — (36, 79) 120 75 7800 0.18 20.1 0.09 1.8 25-100 18.7 142 5624.0 (37, 86) 121 80 11900 0.23 20.2 0.09 1.8 28-104 18.0 — — — (37, 89)122 84 14800 0.28 20.4 0.09 1.8 28-105 21.4 169 818 4.8 (37, 93) 123 8516100 0.31 19.9 0.10 2.0 28-106 23.2 — — — (37, 94) 124 85 21900 0.3120.2 0.10 2.0 28-106 25.2 — — — (36, 94) ^(a)Mole % ethylene in thepolymer, determined by ¹³C NMR. ^(b)Ratio of mole fractions of ethyleneand 1-hexene in the feed. ^(c)Reactivity ratios of ethylene (r_(e)),1-hexene (r_(h)), and their product (r_(e)r_(h)), determined by ¹³C NMR.^(d)Determined by DSC. Samples aged for 36 hours. Numbers in parenthesesare peak melting temperatures. ^(e)Determined by GPC.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

It is evident that the polymers of the present invention, and thepolymerization catalysts and processes by which the polymers areproduced will have wide applicability in industry, inter alia, aselastomers having higher melting points than currently availableelastomers, as thermoplastic materials, and as components for blendingwith other polyolefins for predetermined selected properties, such asraising the melting point of the blend. As noted in Table 7 and theaccompanying discussion, typical polymers of this invention, while theyhave degrees of crystallinity similar to that of Dow's Engage 8200™ andEXXON's 4033™, they have a broader melting point range that extends tohigher temperatures, e.g., to 130° C., and above.

It should be understood that various modifications within the scope ofthis invention can be made by one of ordinary skill in the art withoutdeparting from the spirit thereof. We therefore wish this invention tobe defined by the scope of the appended claims as broadlly as the priorart will permit, and in view of the specification if need be.

We claim:
 1. A method of producing an olefin copolymer from a feedstockincluding ethylene and at least one alpha olefin monomer comprising inany suitable sequence the steps of: a) contacting said feedstock with anunbridged, rotating, non-rigid fluxional metallocene catalyst componentin the presence of a co-catalyst for a time sufficient to produce anelastomeric thermoplastic copolymer; b) said unbridged fluxionalmetallocene catalyst component is selected from at least one compound ofthe formula:

in which M is a Group 3, 4 or 5 Transition metal, a Lanthanide or anActinide; X and X′ are the same or different uninegative ligands; and Land L′ are ligands selected from the same or different substitutedcyclopentadienyl rings; c) said L and L′ cyclopentadienyl ring ligandsubstituents are selected so that the fluxional metallocene componentisomerizes between at least two coordinate geometry states that havedifferent reactivities toward at least one of ethylene and said alphaolefin while in the respective coordinate geometry states, and saidcyclopentadienes are of the general formula:

wherein R₂ through R₁₀ are the same or different hydrogen, alkyl,alkylsilyl, aryl, benzyl alkoxyalkyl, alkoxyaryl, alkoxysilyl,aminoalkyl, aminoaryl, branched alkyl, substituted alkyl, alkylsilyl oraryl substituents of 1 to about 30 carbon atoms; and d) recovering anelastomeric copolylner product.
 2. A polymerization process as in claim1 wherein said uninegative ligands are hydride, halogen, hydrocarbyl,halohydrocarbyl, amine, amide, or borohydride ions; said TransitionMetal is Titanium, Hafnium, Vanadium, and Zirconium; said Group 3 metalis Yttrium; said Lanthanide is Samarium; and said Actinide is Thorium.3. A polymerization process as in claim 2 wherein said cyclopentadieneis an aryl indene of at least one of: 2-phenylindene; 1-methyl-2-phenylindene; 2-(3,5-dimethylphenyl) indene;2-(3,5-bis-tri-fluoromethylphenyl) indene;1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethyiphenyl) indene;2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl) indene; 1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl)indene; 2-(3,5-bis-tri-methylsilylphenyl)indene;1-methyl-2-(3,5-bis-trimethylsilylphenyl)indene; 2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)indene; 2-(2, 3, 4, 5-tetrafluorophenyl) indene; 2-(2, 3, 4, 5,6-pentafluorophenyl) indene; 2-(1-naphthyl) indene; 2-(2-naphthyl)indene; 2-[(4-phenyl)phenyl] indene; 2-[(3-phenyl) phenyl] indene;1-benzl-2-3,5-bis-tertbutylphenyl) indene and 1-benzyl-2-phenylindene.